Ref ID: 18767
Author:
E. Maiolo, PhD – PhD1, F. Ulrika, PhD – PhD 1, S. Dominique, Professor – Professor 2, T. Andrej, MD – MD 1;
Author address:
1Univ. Hosp., Lausanne, Switzerland, 2Institue of microbiology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Full conference title:
52nd Annual ICAAC
Date: 9 September 2014
Abstract:
Objectives: Candida biofilms are difficult to treat due to reduced susceptibility in biofilm. We compared the activity of FZL, AMB and two echinocandins, CAS and AFG, against planktonic and biofilm Candida spp. with microcalorimetry. Methods: C. albicans (ATCC 90028), C. krusei (ATCC 6258), C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) and C. glabrata (DSY 562) were tested. MIC was determined by microbroth dilution. Planktonic Candida species (5×10^5 CFU) were added to RPMI containing serial drug dilutions (0.015-512 μg/ml). Candida biofilm was formed on glass beads for 24 h at 37°C in RPMI. Beads were incubated for 24 h with serial drug dilutions, washed and introduced in RPMI in the calorimeter. The minimal heat inhibitory concentration (MHIC) was defined as the lowest antifungal concentration reducing the heat-flow peak by ≥ 50%. Results: Table shows the MHICs for planktonic and biofilm Candida (µg/ml). The MICs for tested Candida spp. were 0.25-32 µg/ml for FZL, 0.125/0.5 µg/ml for CAS, 0.03-0.125 µg/ml for AFG and 0.5-2 µg/ml for AMB. The activity of FLC was reduced by >1000-fold in Candida biofilms compared to planktonic counterparts. FLC induced growth of planktonic C. krusei at sub-MIC concentrations whereas CAS and AFG, at high concentrations (>8 µg/ml), induced paradoxical growth of planktonic C. albicans. CAS preserved its antibiofilm activity against C. albicans and C. glabrata, but not against C. krusei. The activity of AMPB was reduced in C. albicans biofilms (MHIC >64 µg/ml), compared to planktonic counterparts, but retained activity against C. glabrata (MHIC=8 µg/ml) and C. krusei (MHIC= 4 µg/ml). AFG showed best activity against all Candida biofilms (MHIC 0.5-1 µg/ml). Conclusions: Microcalorimetry allows real-time evaluation of antifungal activity on planktonic and biofilm Candida spp. AFG showed better activity against planktonic and biofilms Candida
Abstract Number: M-974
Conference Year: 2012
Link to conference website: NULL
New link: NULL
Conference abstracts, posters & presentations
-
Title
Author
Year
Number
Poster
-
v
Teclegiorgis Gebremariam [MS]1, Yiyou Gu [PhD]1, Sondus Alkhazraji [PhD]1, Jousha Quran1, Laura K. Najvar [BS]2, Nathan P. Wiederhold [PharmD]2, Thomas F. Patterson [MD]2, Scott G. Filler [MD]1,3, David A. Angulo (MD)4, Ashraf S. Ibrahim [PhD]1,3*,
2024
91
n/a
-
v
Ruta Petraitiene (US)
2024
90
n/a
-
v
Fabio Palmieri (CH), Junier Pilar
2024
89
n/a
-
v
Evelyne Côté (CA)
2024
88
n/a
-
v
Eliane Vanhoffelen (BE)
2024
87
n/a
-
v
Teclegiorgis Gebremariam, Yiyou Gu, Eman Youssef, Sondus Alkhazraji, Joshua Quran, Nathan P. Wiederhold, Ashraf S. Ibrahim
2024
86
n/a
-
v
Thomas Orasch (DE)
2024
85
n/a
-
v
Julien Alex, Katherine González, Gauri Gangapurwala, Antje Vollrath, Zoltán Cseresnyés, Christine Weber, Justyna A. Czaplewska, Stephanie Hoeppener, Carl-Magnus Svensson, Thomas Orasch, Thorsten Heinekamp, Carlos Guerrero-Sánchez, Marc Thilo Figge, Ulrich S. Schubert, Axel A. Brakhage
2024
84
n/a
-
v
Vasireddy Teja, Bibhuti Saha Hod, Soumendranath Haldar (IN)
2024
83
n/a
-
v
Vasireddy Teja, Bibhuti Saha Hod, Soumendranath Haldar (IN)
2024
82
n/a