Ref ID: 19435
Author:
M. Siopi, A. Elefanti, N. Siafakas, L. Zerva and J. Meletiadis
Author address:
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Attikon University Hospital,
Athens, Greece
Full conference title:
6th Trends in Medical Mycology 2013
Date: 11 October 2014
Abstract:
Objectives Voriconazole is often combined with amphotericin B for
the management of refractory invasive aspergillosis. The potential
treatment benefit of polyene-triazole combination therapy is contro-
versial because of conflicting in vitro and in vivo studies. However,
in these studies pharmacodynamic effects were not assessed at clini-
cally relevant concentrations since in vitro and in vivo studied did
not simulated human serum concentration time profiles. We there-
fore investigated the efficacy of voriconazole in combination with
amphotericin B against A. fumigatus simulating free drug concentra-
tions achieved in human serum with a new in vitro PK/PD model.
Methods The A. fumigtaus isolate ATCC MYA-3626 with voriconaz-
ole and amphotericin B CLSI MICs of 0.5 and 1 mg/L, respectively,
was used. Voriconazole and conventional amphotericin B human
standard dosages of 4 mg/kg bid and 1 mg/kg od, respectively were
simulated in a newly developed in vitro PK simulation model. The in
vitro model consists of an internal compartment (IC, a 10 mL dialysis
tube made out of semi-permeable cellulose membrane allowing the
free diffusion of molecules smaller than 20kD) placed inside an exter-
nal compartment (EC, a 700 mL glass beaker) whose content is
diluted with a peristaltic pump at the same rate as the clearance of
the drug in human plasma. The IC was inoculated with a conidial
suspension (103 CFU/mL) and incubated at 37°C for 72 hours, while
voriconazole and amphotericin B were injected alone and in combi-
nation in both compartments every 12 h and 24 h, respectively at
maximum concentrations corresponding to the maximum concentra-
tions of unbound drugs in human serum (fCmax) of 1.7 mg/l and
0.1 mg/l, respectively. Voriconazole and amphotericin B fCmax were
determined based on the 58% and 95% protein binding and the
mean maximum concentrations of total drugs of 4 mg/l and 2 mg/l
achieved in human serum, respectively (Purkins et al AAC 2002,
Ayastraran et al AAC 1996). Drug levels were determined by micro-
biological afar diffusion assays and fungal growth by measuring the
galactomannan production in the IC using a commercially available
sandwich-ELISA. The% of fungal growth was calculated based on the
area under the galactomannan-time curve. The interactions were
analyzed based on the Bliss independence model where the observed
growth EOBS was compared the theoretical ETHE if the two drugs were
acting independently as EVORxEAMB where EVOR and EAMB are the% of
voriconazole and amphotericin B alone, respectively. Synergy was
concluded when EOBS < ETHE (t test p < 0.05). All experiments were
repeated two times.
Results The model simulated well voriconazole and amphotericin B
human pharmacokinetics as drug concentration-time profiles corre-
sponded to those observed in human serum. Both monotherapies of
amphotericin B and voriconazole resulted in 86 8% and
40 3.6%fungal growth indicating that drug concentrations were
suboptimal. The two-drug combination resulted in 8.6 1% growth
with Bliss interaction analysis showing a synergistic effect of
25.8 2.5% (p < 0.05).
Conclusion The double combination of voriconazole plus amphoteri-
cin B may be synergistic against A. fumigatus at clinically achievable
serum concentrations, enhancing the overall efficacy of poly-
ene+azole combination therapy particularly in patients with subopti-
mal drug concentrations.
Abstract Number: p306
Conference Year: 2013
Link to conference website: NULL
New link: NULL
Conference abstracts, posters & presentations
-
Title
Author
Year
Number
Poster
-
v
Teclegiorgis Gebremariam [MS]1, Yiyou Gu [PhD]1, Sondus Alkhazraji [PhD]1, Jousha Quran1, Laura K. Najvar [BS]2, Nathan P. Wiederhold [PharmD]2, Thomas F. Patterson [MD]2, Scott G. Filler [MD]1,3, David A. Angulo (MD)4, Ashraf S. Ibrahim [PhD]1,3*,
2024
91
n/a
-
v
Ruta Petraitiene (US)
2024
90
n/a
-
v
Fabio Palmieri (CH), Junier Pilar
2024
89
n/a
-
v
Evelyne Côté (CA)
2024
88
n/a
-
v
Eliane Vanhoffelen (BE)
2024
87
n/a
-
v
Teclegiorgis Gebremariam, Yiyou Gu, Eman Youssef, Sondus Alkhazraji, Joshua Quran, Nathan P. Wiederhold, Ashraf S. Ibrahim
2024
86
n/a
-
v
Thomas Orasch (DE)
2024
85
n/a
-
v
Julien Alex, Katherine González, Gauri Gangapurwala, Antje Vollrath, Zoltán Cseresnyés, Christine Weber, Justyna A. Czaplewska, Stephanie Hoeppener, Carl-Magnus Svensson, Thomas Orasch, Thorsten Heinekamp, Carlos Guerrero-Sánchez, Marc Thilo Figge, Ulrich S. Schubert, Axel A. Brakhage
2024
84
n/a
-
v
Vasireddy Teja, Bibhuti Saha Hod, Soumendranath Haldar (IN)
2024
83
n/a
-
v
Vasireddy Teja, Bibhuti Saha Hod, Soumendranath Haldar (IN)
2024
82
n/a