Ref ID: 19358
Author:
K. Vanstraelen, K. Lagrou, J. Maertens, L. Willems and
I. Spriet
Author address:
University Hospitals Leuven – Research Centre for Clinical
Pharmacy, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven –
Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
and University Hospitals Leuven – Hematology ward, Belgium
Full conference title:
6th Trends in Medical Mycology 2013
Date: 11 October 2014
Abstract:
Objectives Retrospective evaluation of two years therapeutic drug
monitoring (TDM) of voriconazole in a tertiary care center.
Methods Patients treated with voriconazole, with at least 1 vorico-
nazole trough level (VTL), were included. VTLs were determined
using LC-MSMS (Pauwels et al. 2012, Clin Chim Acta) with 1-
5,5 mg/L as therapeutic interval (Pascual et al. 2008, CID). Statisti-
cal analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows, p < 0.05
was considered significant.
Results 726 VTLs were obtained from 185 patients (table 1). 28 VTLs
(4,7%) were below the limit of quantification of 0.2 mg/L. 589 samples
(81.1%) were obtained during hospitalization (table 2), the others were
from ambulatory patients, with little information available, resulting in
median VTLs of 2.2 and 1.7 mg/L respectively (p = 0.000).
During hospitalization, 117 VTLs (19.9%) were below 1 mg/L and 260
VTLs (44.1%) below 2 mg/L (Trifilio et al, 2007, Cancer). Additionally,
91 VTLs (15.5%) were supratherapeutic. No correlations were seen with
age (R² = 0.008), body weight (R² = 0.000) and daily dose expressed in
mg/kg (R² = 0.011) or mg (R² = 0.008), confirming the unpredictable
dose-exposure relationship. Daily dose (mg) and body weight were only
weakly correlated (R² = 0.270), possibly due to the use of standard
doses instead of exact doses calculated on body weight.
129 patients (69.7%) had at least one follow-up level. 56 (43.5%)
had a non-therapeutic first VTL, which remained non-therapeutic in the follow-up level in 41.1%. No clear correlation was found between
the initial and follow-up VTL (R² = 0.378). Remarkably, 24.5% and
29% of initial subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic VTL were not fol-
lowed by a control VTL.
Intravenously administered (IV) voriconazole (328 VTLs; 55.7%)
results in higher VTLs (table 2). Also omeprazole elevates VTLs vs.
ranitidine and pantoprazole (Boyd et al, 2012, AAC). No difference
was seen in VTLs between pantoprazole and ranitidine co-administra-
tion, suggesting no need for voriconazole dose adjustment when
combining with pantoprazole. Also, more co-administration with
omeprazole (39.1% vs. 26%, p = 0.019), and less with pantoprazole
(34.5% vs. 51.2%, p = 0.005) was seen in case of supratherapeutic
VTLs vs. (sub-)therapeutic VTLs. As shown in table 2, dose and route
of administration of omeprazole are also important.
Abstract Number: o2.1
Conference Year: 2013
Link to conference website: NULL
New link: NULL
Conference abstracts, posters & presentations
-
Title
Author
Year
Number
Poster
-
v
Teclegiorgis Gebremariam [MS]1, Yiyou Gu [PhD]1, Sondus Alkhazraji [PhD]1, Jousha Quran1, Laura K. Najvar [BS]2, Nathan P. Wiederhold [PharmD]2, Thomas F. Patterson [MD]2, Scott G. Filler [MD]1,3, David A. Angulo (MD)4, Ashraf S. Ibrahim [PhD]1,3*,
2024
91
n/a
-
v
Ruta Petraitiene (US)
2024
90
n/a
-
v
Fabio Palmieri (CH), Junier Pilar
2024
89
n/a
-
v
Evelyne Côté (CA)
2024
88
n/a
-
v
Eliane Vanhoffelen (BE)
2024
87
n/a
-
v
Teclegiorgis Gebremariam, Yiyou Gu, Eman Youssef, Sondus Alkhazraji, Joshua Quran, Nathan P. Wiederhold, Ashraf S. Ibrahim
2024
86
n/a
-
v
Thomas Orasch (DE)
2024
85
n/a
-
v
Julien Alex, Katherine González, Gauri Gangapurwala, Antje Vollrath, Zoltán Cseresnyés, Christine Weber, Justyna A. Czaplewska, Stephanie Hoeppener, Carl-Magnus Svensson, Thomas Orasch, Thorsten Heinekamp, Carlos Guerrero-Sánchez, Marc Thilo Figge, Ulrich S. Schubert, Axel A. Brakhage
2024
84
n/a
-
v
Vasireddy Teja, Bibhuti Saha Hod, Soumendranath Haldar (IN)
2024
83
n/a
-
v
Vasireddy Teja, Bibhuti Saha Hod, Soumendranath Haldar (IN)
2024
82
n/a