Ref ID: 19373
Author:
C. Hortnagl,1 G. Blum,2 C. Speth,2 G. Rambach,2 H. Dietrich3
and C. Lass-Florl2
Author address:
1Medical University Innsbruck, Austria; 2Department of Hygiene
and Social Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria and
3Central Laboratory Animal Facility, Innsbruck, Austria
Full conference title:
6th Trends in Medical Mycology 2013
Date: 11 October 2014
Abstract:
Objective Amphotericin B (AMB) is one of the most commonly used
antimycotics to treat fungal infections in humans. It is active against
most pathogenic fungi and used to be the antas in therapy for critically
ill patients with invasive mould infections (IMI) and invasive aspergil-
losis (IA). IMI and IA have become increasingly common among
immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients including solid-
organ or haematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients and individu-
als who are on immunosuppressive drug regimens. The majority of IA
is caused by Aspergillus fumigatus followed by Aspergillus terreus (A. ter-
reus) and Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus). In particular, A. terreus, a wide-
spread soil saprophyte and producer of several secondary metabolites,
is a common cause of infection at the UniversityHospital of Innsbruck
(UHI), Austria. In vivo and in vitro data indicate that AMB resistance
and emergence of resistance during AMB therapy is rare but almost all
A. terreus isolates are intrinsically resistant to AMB, and a high mortal-
ity rate is associated with this particular mould. It is unclear whether
low AMB-MICs (< 0.20 lg/ml) reflect clinical response and thus corre-
late with the in vivo situation; no data are available on strains with
AMB-MIC < 0.20 lg/ml. For this study we compared AMB resistant A.
terreus strains (ATR; AMB-MIC 4 lg/ml) and a rare A. terreus vari-
ant showing enhanced susceptibility (ATS; AMB-MIC 0.20 lg/ml) in
response to AMB in vivo. ATS and ATR were susceptible to other anti-
fungal agents (e. g. azoles).
Methods Inbred BALB/c mice were intravenously (i.v.) injected with
200 mg of cyclophosphamide/kg of body weight on day 3 and every
5th day to produce prolonged immunosuppression. All the mice were
inoculated with ATR or ATS on day 0 by intravenous injection of
1 9 106 conidia (100 ll of a 107-conidia/ml stock solution in 0.9%
NaCl) into the tail vein. Mice were intraperitoneally treated with
5 mg/kg Amphotericin B deoxycholate and 4 mg/kg Voriconazole
(VORI). Organ fungal load (cfu) was checked via fungal plate count.
Results ATS infection per se killed 50% of the mice by day 3 and
was significantly more lethal than ATR (P < 0.05). At day 18, all
mice infected with the ATS strain died, whereas 17% of the animals
infected with ATR who received no treatment survived. AMB treat-
ment improved survival in ATS infection up to 75%, while this was
not the case with ATR infection (P < 0.05). Survival outcome of
ATS infected mice with AMB treatment was comparable with VORI
therapy. VORI therapy in ATR infected mice significantly enhanced
survival compared to AMB. Survival was independent of fungal
organ load and showed significant differences between the AMB and
VORI groups.
Conclusion Our in vivo murine model of disseminated aspergillosis
showed that ATS was highly virulent, indicating that loss of fungal
fitness is not associated with the appearance of AMB susceptibility.
AMB therapy enhanced survival outcome of ATS infected mice. AMB
and VORI treatment rescued ATR infected mice, yet independent of
the fungal organ load.
Abstract Number: p004
Conference Year: 2013
Link to conference website: NULL
New link: NULL
Conference abstracts, posters & presentations
-
Title
Author
Year
Number
Poster
-
v
Teclegiorgis Gebremariam [MS]1, Yiyou Gu [PhD]1, Sondus Alkhazraji [PhD]1, Jousha Quran1, Laura K. Najvar [BS]2, Nathan P. Wiederhold [PharmD]2, Thomas F. Patterson [MD]2, Scott G. Filler [MD]1,3, David A. Angulo (MD)4, Ashraf S. Ibrahim [PhD]1,3*,
2024
91
n/a
-
v
Ruta Petraitiene (US)
2024
90
n/a
-
v
Fabio Palmieri (CH), Junier Pilar
2024
89
n/a
-
v
Evelyne Côté (CA)
2024
88
n/a
-
v
Eliane Vanhoffelen (BE)
2024
87
n/a
-
v
Teclegiorgis Gebremariam, Yiyou Gu, Eman Youssef, Sondus Alkhazraji, Joshua Quran, Nathan P. Wiederhold, Ashraf S. Ibrahim
2024
86
n/a
-
v
Thomas Orasch (DE)
2024
85
n/a
-
v
Julien Alex, Katherine González, Gauri Gangapurwala, Antje Vollrath, Zoltán Cseresnyés, Christine Weber, Justyna A. Czaplewska, Stephanie Hoeppener, Carl-Magnus Svensson, Thomas Orasch, Thorsten Heinekamp, Carlos Guerrero-Sánchez, Marc Thilo Figge, Ulrich S. Schubert, Axel A. Brakhage
2024
84
n/a
-
v
Vasireddy Teja, Bibhuti Saha Hod, Soumendranath Haldar (IN)
2024
83
n/a
-
v
Vasireddy Teja, Bibhuti Saha Hod, Soumendranath Haldar (IN)
2024
82
n/a